10 Jun 1996
LI KAM-WING v. CHAN KAM-KAN AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LI KAM-WING v. CHAN KAM-KAN AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDNT2999/1995
Both alleged sub-tenancies were invalid because their durations extended beyond the principal tenancy and their inconsistent terms and self-contradictory evidence demonstrated no enforceable tenancy; at best the co-respondent had a licence which terminated on forfeiture of the principal tenancy, so possession was ordered for the landlord.