18 Feb 2000
HKSAR v. CHAN PUN CHUNG AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHAN PUN CHUNG AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA364/1999
Because the applicants conceded that the conduct remained unlawful and that the legislature could not have intended to render such conduct unenforceable, and because the Court found the true intent of the transitional provisions to permit prosecution for pre-abolition conspiracy, there was no point of law of great and general importance to certify; accordingly the application for a certificate under s.32(2) was refused.