28 May 2019
EMINENT INVESTMENTS (ASIA PACIFIC) LTD v. DIO CORPORATION
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 606
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV207/2016
Clause 3(i) must be read as requiring a link between the advisor's introduction and the transaction completed; the clause contemplates a transaction 'introduced by' Eminent and thus demands that Eminent introduced the completed transaction before earning the fee. On the facts Eminent did not introduce the completed Dentsply transaction and so is not entitled to the claimed success fee.