16 Apr 2008
HKSAR v. CRUZ PABLO JR. IGNACIO
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CRUZ PABLO JR. IGNACIO
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA977/2007
Magistrate's interventions did not amount to bias and were permissible; the credibility findings for PW1 and PW2 were properly reached despite minor discrepancies; the physical evidence and agreed fee corroborated their account; attempting to examine a decoy while donning mask/glove and agreeing a fee constituted holding oneself out as practising dentistry within s.2(2) or otherwise amounted to practising dentistry; therefore the convictions were safe and the appeal is dismissed.