3 Mar 2006
YEUNG FU v. GUARDFORCE LTD
- Citation
- YEUNG FU v. GUARDFORCE LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCPI213/2004
The court held that requests for particulars must be confined to material facts that define the opponent's case rather than fishing for evidence; where the Defence's averments as to sufficient rest were unclear on core matters (whether plaintiff had to work all basic working days; the rotation schedule of the plaintiff's watches; roster for rest days; the definition of 'resting time'), limited further and better particulars should be ordered to identify those material facts (with temporal limits). Conversely, requests seeking evidence, documentary proof or matters for discovery were disallowe…