14 Mar 2025
GREAT PACIFIC INVESTMENTS LTD v. 张华荣
- Citation
- [2025] HKCA 266
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV206/2023
Leave to appeal was refused because the defendant did not raise any question of great general or public importance, merely sought to reargue matters already rejected by the courts below, and failed to show exceptional circumstances to engage the overriding discretion; the Court of Appeal correctly rejected the estoppel defence given the no oral modification clause and the plaintiff's rejection of Form 16 which operated as reasonable notice ending any suspensory estoppel, rendering the intended appeal devoid of merits.