31 Mar 2010
HKSAR v. HABIBULLAH ABDUL RAHMAN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- HKSAR v. HABIBULLAH ABDUL RAHMAN AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC302/2008
Court found on balance that a specific asset-injection plan existed from the outset and that certain applicants knowingly participated in tacit agreements to conceal that plan by false or obfuscatory statements to regulators and shareholders; the trial judge erred in failing to identify all documents admitted under the co-conspirator's rule but, applying s.83(1) CPO proviso, the Court of Appeal upheld some convictions where the admissible evidence excluding tainted documents inevitably supported guilt and quashed others where admissible evidence was insufficient. The co-conspirator's rule mus…