2 Dec 2005
NAM TAI TRADING CO LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
- Citation
- NAM TAI TRADING CO LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL80/2004
The application was dismissed because the Commissioner lawfully applied the IRD holdover policy (DIPN 6) and reached different, reasonable conclusions for the two years based on materially different evidence of recoupment; the partial unconditional holdover and conditional holdover with TRC requirement for HK$4,420,000 were lawful under s71(2); there was no irrationality, failure to give adequate reasons, error of law or legitimate expectation warranting relief.