18 Jun 1980
Temporary buildings are not necessarily excluded from the Ordinance, but on these facts the lease was taken for use of the land for brickmaking and the 1972 six-year lease covered non-domestic business premises; therefore s.3(1)(e) excludes the premises from Part I protection and the appellant is not protected under Cap.7, so the appeal is dismissed.
20 Nov 1973
Because the 1973 Temporary Provisions Ordinance potentially protects persons who 'retain possession' at its commencement and the defendant prima facie claimed to be such a person, the strike out could not be sustained on the papers and leave to defend was properly granted on this fresh hearing.
The 1 March 1976 document purporting to create a three-year tenancy did not remove the protection of Part II because the protected tenancy pre‑existed and had not been determined by any method provided in Part II; therefore the document could only purport to create a new tenancy and could not legally do so, so Part II continued to apply.