19 Jul 2005
BANK OF CHINA (HONG KONG) LTD v. CHAN TIN CHI AND OTHERS
- Citation
- BANK OF CHINA (HONG KONG) LTD v. CHAN TIN CHI AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA4215/2003
The amendment to introduce a unilateral termination defence was refused because under general law no such right exists for liabilities already incurred and clause 6 only affects future liabilities first incurred after six months' notice; the proposed defence would not negate the indebtedness sued upon and is therefore unarguable, so the application is refused and specified paragraphs struck out.