12 May 2017
RE CHEN CHERYL DEANNA
- Citation
- RE CHEN CHERYL DEANNA
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCB3082/2016
The petitioner’s variation application was refused because the 4th and 5th affidavits were not properly and timely served or reliance on them was disproportionate given proximity to the hearing; the debtor’s application for leave to appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction because it was filed out of time and not brought inter partes as required by O.59 r.2B, and in any event disclosed no arguable grounds; accordingly no order as to costs was made in respect of each application.