21 Mar 2023
The notice of motion for leave to appeal was dismissed because it was filed out of time without any adequate or supported explanation for the delay and the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) HKCFAO, so leave could not be granted.
27 Sept 2022
The Court refused to extend time and dismissed the Notice of Motion because the applicant’s 15‑month delay was excessive, the reason given (unparticularized lack of money) did not justify the delay, the intended appeal lacked merit and did not raise any question of great general or public importance under s.22(1)(b) HKCFAO, and the applicant failed to comply with directions to file written submissions enabling determination on paper.
10 Aug 2021
The application was refused because it was filed out of time and the applicant failed to show good and sufficient grounds for an extension; there were no arguable grounds of appeal and no question of great general or public importance, making an extension futile.