6 Aug 2021
OR PUI KWAN v. SINO BRIGHT (H.K.) LTD
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 2311
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP757/2021
The applicants failed to show the original vendors retained any proprietary interest in the ROW because the assignments (together with s16 CPO) passed appurtenances with the land, the vendors had disposed of their remaining shares, and the ROW appears to be a common passage enjoyed by all co-owners; therefore there was no trustee interest to support a vesting order and the originating summons was dismissed.