2 Apr 2012
香港特別行政區 訴 梁蔚邦
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 梁蔚邦
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA336/2011
The trial judge erred in finding there was no evidence to engage Trade Marks Ordinance s20(1); defence exhibit D3 raised a real question that the goods may be parallel imports, and the prosecution therefore failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the goods carried forged trademarks or that possession of P2 was for sale; accordingly the convictions were unsafe and were quashed.