10 Dec 2008
DAMON NEICH-BUCKLEY AND OTHERS v. CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- DAMON NEICH-BUCKLEY AND OTHERS v. CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA299/2006
The judge held that the impugned passages of Warham's WS and SWS were properly struck out because they went beyond permissible background, were irrelevant to the pleaded factual issues, and contained inadmissible opinion, hearsay, expert and legal submissions; accordingly the strike‑out summonses succeeded and paragraph 24 of Rhodes' statement was also struck out, with costs ordered against the plaintiffs.