19 Jan 2006
CHAN KIN SHING SONNY v. INSIDER DEALING TRIBUNAL
- Citation
- CHAN KIN SHING SONNY v. INSIDER DEALING TRIBUNAL
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV360/2005
The Court held that the Tribunal's factual findings — that the weekend contacts constituted relevant price sensitive information and that the pattern of telephone calls, trading activity and related payments justified inferences of tipping and procurement — were supported by substantial evidence and not open to successful challenge on appeal as fact; it struck out Sonny Chan's appeal as purely factual and granted Koon limited leave only on narrow factual issues concerning whether Koon arranged Lam's 3.2 million share purchase (grounds 8,10-13).