25 Oct 2013
CHANG HYUN CHI v. OFFICIAL RECEIVER AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- CHANG HYUN CHI v. OFFICIAL RECEIVER AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV110/2013
The court refused the trustees' application for security for costs because, given the appellant's impecuniosity and that the appeal had substantial merits, ordering security would effectively stultify the appeal; accordingly the exercise of discretion required refusing security and making no order as to costs. The judge also treated s.30A(10)(a) as distinguishable from s.30A(10)(b)(i) and found it capable of being Basic Law-compliant in context.