19 Dec 2011
TANG KAP WING TSO v. TANG LEUK TSO AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- TANG KAP WING TSO v. TANG LEUK TSO AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV196/2010
Leave to appeal was granted under s.22(1)(a) because there was a liquidated sum in the claim and the judgment was final; the 2003 Deed was held binding because the co-manager acted with authorization or acquiescence and the alienation was valid under the unanimous fong-head rule from Re Lau Wai Chau; leave under s.22(1)(b) was refused as no question of general or public importance arose; payment of $200,000 into court within three months was ordered under s.25 as a condition of leave and the costs of the leave application were made costs in the appeal.