Hong Kong Case Law

13 Feb 1973

TO SZE MING v. THE QUEEN

Citation

TO SZE MING v. THE QUEEN

Court

Court of Appeal

Case number

CACC836/1972

The court affirmed the sentences because the robbery was deliberate and violent, the trial judge had taken mitigation into account, and there was no basis for appellate interference with the exercise of sentencing discretion, including the imposition of the consecutive one‑year term.

• Aggravated burglary
• Possession of arms without a licence
• Wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm
• Unlawful control of ammunition without a licence
• Concurrent and consecutive sentences
• Appellate review of sentence