30 Dec 2021
香港特別行政區 訴 CARITAS – HONG KONG
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 3720
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA263/2021
The conviction was upheld because the trial judge properly accepted expert evidence that the grinder without an auxiliary handle posed a foreseeable rebound risk and was unsafe for the work; the employer failed, within what was reasonably practicable, to provide safe equipment or adequate training and supervision; and the judge's active questioning did not render the trial unfair, so the factual findings and conviction are safe.