16 Aug 1996
R. v. LARM TAT MING
- Citation
- R. v. LARM TAT MING
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC137/1996
The Court held that the trial judge lawfully and reasonably accepted the taped conversations and transcripts as establishing the three conspiracies; the applicant's criticisms (chain of custody, non‑production of informant/statements/vehicles, alleged bias) did not undermine the conviction; the sentencing decision, including a discount for involvement of ICAC agents, was within principled bounds and not manifestly excessive; accordingly leave to appeal against conviction and sentence was refused.