6 Aug 2018
SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHENG KA YEE AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 1809
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA466/2017
The appeal is dismissed because the actus reus of s161(1)(c) could not be proved: photographing and transmitting questions on respondents' own smartphones and D3's authorized use of a school desktop did not amount to unauthorized extraction or access to a computer as required by Li Man Wai; moreover the magistrate's credibility and dishonesty findings were not perverse and did not merit appellate interference.