31 Jul 2018
香港特別行政區 訴 秦錦釗及另五人
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 920
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCC919/2015
The court dismissed the second application for a permanent stay because the defendants failed to establish that the asserted infringements (restriction of counsel choice, invalid subpoenas issued by a defendant, letters rogatory process, absence of certain mainland witnesses, alleged deceptive warrants or unlawful searches, or disputed characterisation of proceeds) met the high threshold for permanent stay; specific subpoenas tendered by a defendant were declared invalid and the remaining complaints either lacked evidential foundation or had been previously determined.