17 Jan 1997
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. SHIMIZU CORPORATION
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. SHIMIZU CORPORATION
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV186/1996
The court held that the parties' agreed 'guillotine' procedural code limited the arbitrator's power to reserve final determination and that an unauthorised departure from that agreed procedure amounted to misconduct justifying remission; global claims presented under Crosby must be presented with sufficient particularisation or else risk dismissal in whole; consequently remissions ordered by the judge below in favour of the contractor for certain global claims were quashed while the rubbish removal claim was remitted to the arbitrator to reconsider only on the existing material (no reopening…