29 Dec 1995
BRUNO PAUL YVES GHISLAIN SEGHIN v. MARIE CLAIRE VALENTINE ROBERTINE SEGHIN
- Citation
- BRUNO PAUL YVES GHISLAIN SEGHIN v. MARIE CLAIRE VALENTINE ROBERTINE SEGHIN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3953/1995
Leave to appeal was granted because the appeal was not unarguable given the long term future of the children, but a stay of the removal order was justified until 31 January 1996 or final determination of the appeal, conditional on the husband vacating specified premises to permit the wife and children to reside there, payment of HK$20,000 by the husband to the wife by 2 January 1996, the husband arranging visa extensions, and the stay being automatically rescinded on non‑compliance; costs of the application were reserved to the appeal hearing.