7 May 2012
TAM PO KEI v. TAM BO KIN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- TAM PO KEI v. TAM BO KIN AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV267/2010
The Court of Appeal allowed the respondents' appeal because the trial judge's adverse findings against the 1st respondent on the principal accounting complaints were either unsupported by the totality of evidence or produced a risk of double recovery. The court held that the trial judge overlooked the contemporaneous documentary evidence and his own findings that the Father remained in control and had approved transactions (invoking the Duomatic concept), thereby undermining the basis for ordering the 1st‑5th respondents to buy out the petitioner. Only the finding that access to books had bee…