20 Oct 2023
史超 v. 均富有限公司 AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2023] HKDC 1472
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ5015/2017
Application dismissed because the medical evidence failed to answer critical requisitions about the plaintiff's ability to give and complete evidence (including endurance of stress, suitability for cross‑examination and ability to attend proposed hours), the plaintiff's willingness to attempt travel undermined the asserted inability to travel, and the application was late and prejudicial to the 2nd defendant; therefore no valid reason justified departing from in‑person testimony and the balance of interests required refusal.