2 Aug 2024
陳淑仁 對 賴俊光及另一人
- Citation
- [2024] HKCA 737
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP254/2023
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any legal issue of great and general or public importance under s.22(1)(b) and the proposed grounds were merely repetitive factual complaints without arguable legal error; accordingly the application had no real prospect of success and was dismissed, with costs to the respondents to be summarily assessed.