20 Mar 2015
SUPREMACY TRADING CO LTD v. PEARL DRAGON INVESTMENTS LTD
- Citation
- SUPREMACY TRADING CO LTD v. PEARL DRAGON INVESTMENTS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA57/2014
The Adjudicator erred in law by treating the signed and stamped documents as establishing binding new tenancies despite absence of communicated acceptance prior to the claimant's withdrawal; on the undisputed primary facts the purported acceptances were not communicated in time and the claimant validly terminated, so the Tribunal's orders were set aside and judgment entered for the claimant.