12 Nov 2018
INTERPROCOM LTD v. SILVER WINGS TRADING CO., LTD.
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 1378
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ4383/2012
Defendant failed to prove the examined watches were the 111 AR watches and failed to prove the watches were counterfeit or unmerchantable; key defendant witness was found not credible on the central issue and the expert comparison to official dealer samples did not prove counterfeit status given admitted parallel import nature; therefore plaintiff entitled to payment of €8,978.76 for 111 AR watches with interest and costs; counterclaim dismissed.