25 Jul 2024
唐弋蘇 對 新衛保安服務有限公司
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 1882
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA26/2023
The Court found the adjudicator had not properly considered the observations set out in the earlier judgment (Part 4) when ordering an indefinite adjournment; accordingly the Court, exercising its power under Labour Tribunal Ordinance s.35(1)(c), remitted the applicant's application to the Labour Tribunal for reconsideration with directions to take the Court's observations in Part 4 into account and awarded costs to the applicant assessed summarily at HKD 3,000 (provisional).