13 May 2020
The trial judge’s adverse credibility findings and conclusion that the appellant did not make reasonable efforts to identify the driver were justified; applying established precedent and statutory considerations the sentence of a $3,000 fine and six‑month driving disqualification was within the permissible range and not manifestly excessive, so the appeal is dismissed.
17 Dec 2014
The magistrate did not err in refusing an adjournment because the late disclosure was not prejudicial given the narrow single-issue dispute, the appellant had adequate time and opportunity to read documents and to cross-examine, and the magistrate's credibility findings—supported by photos and witness demeanour—provided a sufficient basis for conviction; therefore the appeal is dismissed.
21 May 2001
Because the company could not demonstrate a realistic prospect of obtaining a validation order for any proposed asset sale and effectively admitted insolvency, there was no purpose in adjourning and the petition for winding-up succeeded.