29 Apr 1997
R. v. TSO KAM ON
- Citation
- R. v. TSO KAM ON
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC487/1996
The application to adduce additional evidence under s83V was refused because the proffered material would not afford a ground for allowing the appeal (the first affidavit was not mitigating and the financial evidence was inconclusive and undermined by nondisclosure); on the substantive appeal the sentences were neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive, so the total sentence of 8 years was upheld.