7 Jul 1983
THE QUEEN v. THOMAS DACRE CARNELLEY AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. THOMAS DACRE CARNELLEY AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC137/1983
Appeals allowed because the trial process was tainted by a real possibility that the judge considered evidence from a separate, successive trial and because the judge failed properly to understand and evaluate the 3rd Defendant's pleaded defences and supporting witness evidence; as a result convictions on the pipe-related charge were quashed and retrial on the remaining matters was ordered where appropriate.