15 Jan 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 陳雪梅
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 928
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA352/2024
On rehearing the court found the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant dishonestly took the watch and intended to permanently deprive the owner; the interview record was voluntary and admissible; the trial judge’s credibility findings were justified by the evidence; therefore the conviction and the 10‑month sentence (after a 2‑month reduction from a 12‑month starting point) are upheld.