21 Feb 1995
R. v. CHAN SAI KIT
- Citation
- R. v. CHAN SAI KIT
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC619/1993
The tapes and evidence of insurance and proposed will alterations were properly admissible as evidence of continuing enmity and motive; the forensic scientist (Mr Tang) exceeded proper scope by opining the fire was "more probably accidental" but his limited conclusion did not negate a case to answer given the totality of expert and circumstantial evidence; omission to direct on manslaughter was an error but harmless under the proviso; appeal dismissed.