13 Dec 2011
HKSAR v. CALAUNAN CONCEPCION SALCEDO
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CALAUNAN CONCEPCION SALCEDO<br>
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC109/2010
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the summing-up, read as a whole, adequately presented the applicant's oral testimony as the defence case and the record of interview and passport evidence were properly admissible and legitimately used to test credibility; any omissions were not irregular or prejudicial given that passport evidence was put before the jury at defence initiative and prosecution did not allege prior trafficking on earlier trips.