30 Apr 2012
黃桂生 對 張偉明
- Citation
- 黃桂生 對 張偉明
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1726/2009
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate a serious question to be tried: the decisive defect was inability to show 12 years occupation on the evidence. No fresh affidavit was filed or shown to satisfy Ladd v Marshall, and there was no basis to vary the costs order; therefore the interlocutory judgment was correct and leave is refused.