23 Nov 1995
R. v. TAM SIU LUNG and Another
- Citation
- R. v. TAM SIU LUNG and Another
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC200/1995
The leave applications were refused because, despite discrepancies in witness times and peripheral defects, the overwhelming circumstantial and forensic evidence — defendants fleeing armed, blood‑stained clothing and gloves, weapon and blood traces in the taxi matching a victim — made the convictions safe and the trial judge's credibility findings reasonable.