Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Hong Kong Case Law

Air waybill terms
  • 9 Apr 1991

    KA DA WATCH CO LTD v. SKYWORLD AIR EXPRESS LTD

    Citation
    KA DA WATCH CO LTD v. SKYWORLD AIR EXPRESS LTD
    Court
    Court of Appeal
    Case number
    CACV62/1990

    The Court held that the defendant (via its agent) acted recklessly with knowledge that releasing the goods without bank release confirmation would probably cause the plaintiff to lose its D/P security; therefore Article 25 disapplies the Article 22 limits. Clause 24(iii) of the house air waybill, which attempts to limit liability to US$20/kg and does not accommodate Article 25 exceptions, tends to relieve the carrier and is null and void under Article 23(1). Damages for loss of security were assessed at 90% of invoice value = US$9,855 and judgment entered for plaintiff; interest reserved for…

  • 9 Jun 1989

    EMERY AIR FREIGHT CORPORATION v. EQUUS TRICOTS LTD

    Citation
    EMERY AIR FREIGHT CORPORATION v. EQUUS TRICOTS LTD
    Court
    Court of First Instance
    Case number
    HCA6778/1988

    The air waybill condition is a contracting clause that excludes the defendant's right of set-off and the established rule barring set-off in actions for freight (as applied to sea and road) applies to air freight; therefore the defendant is not entitled to a stay of execution and the plaintiff's appeal must succeed.