30 May 2006
SPORTS TECHNOLOGY (ASIA) LTD v. CLARIDGE HOUSE LTD
- Citation
- SPORTS TECHNOLOGY (ASIA) LTD v. CLARIDGE HOUSE LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1478/2004
The PO constituted the underlying contract; the requirement to present an Architect's certificate was a term of the separate letter of credit, not an independent condition precedent in the underlying contract; the Plaintiff had completed the works in the ordinary/substantial sense, the Defendant failed to substantiate the alleged defects, the LC had expired so the Plaintiff's right to sue for the outstanding instalment revived, and judgment was entered for the Plaintiff for HK$333,060.40 with interest; the Defendant's counterclaim was dismissed.