4 Aug 2014
KOMAL PATEL AND OTHERS v. CHRIS AU AND OTHERS
- Citation
- KOMAL PATEL AND OTHERS v. CHRIS AU AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA183/2014
The court refused the adjournment and declined to order an inquiry as to damages because the 1st and 2nd defendants failed to adduce credible evidence that the injunction of 29 January 2014 caused them compensable loss; in the exercise of its discretion and having regard to the purpose of the injunction (freezing substantial funds in the 3rd defendant) and the defendants' conduct, enforcement of the plaintiffs' undertaking was refused and no inquiry ordered.