27 Nov 2017
NEO INTELLIGENCE HOLDINGS LTD v. GIANT CROWN INDUSTRIES LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- NEO INTELLIGENCE HOLDINGS LTD v. GIANT CROWN INDUSTRIES LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1127/2017
The November Agreement was a supplemental/amending instrument and did not plainly and unequivocally amend or waive the arbitration clause in Clause 8.1 of the June Agreement; Clause 4.1 of the November Agreement can be read as a governing law/jurisdiction clause operating in parallel with the arbitration clause; defendants established a prima facie or plainly arguable case that the parties are bound by the arbitration clause and a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration was therefore justified; plaintiff ordered to pay defendants' costs of the summons nisi.