12 Sept 2013
HKSAR v. CHAE MAN TOCK AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. CHAE MAN TOCK AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC255/2012
On the totality of admissible evidence (bank records describing payments as wages, consistent email correspondence, banking transfers into applicants' accounts, witnesses' corroborated testimony and admissions), the judge was entitled to find the 1st applicant remained an employee and that both applicants knowingly participated in invoice inflation and receipt of advantages; the judge did not err in admitting or weighing the evidence and correctly exercised his discretion to allow the late addition of substantive fraud charges; accordingly leave to appeal against conviction was refused.