30 Aug 2012
RE LEE PIT TAT
- Citation
- RE LEE PIT TAT
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCB954/1985
The court found the omission was not inadvertent because the 2004 correspondence from BOC/KBC unambiguously stated it would not enforce the charging order, demonstrating an intention to surrender the security; accordingly the application to amend the proof of debt was dismissed.