26 Feb 2026
香港特別行政區 訴 徐玉蘭
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 484
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA442/2024
The trial judge properly rejected the appellant's evidence as inconsistent and implausible; the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant, knowing of the dog's prolonged and serious condition, unreasonably failed to obtain veterinary treatment causing unnecessary suffering; on re‑hearing the High Court reached the same conclusion and dismissed the appeal.