20 Mar 2015
SUPREMACY TRADING CO LTD v. ASIAN PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD
- Citation
- SUPREMACY TRADING CO LTD v. ASIAN PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA56/2014
The adjudicator erred in law in finding binding new tenancy agreements because acceptance had not been communicated to the claimant before withdrawal; accordingly the claimant validly terminated the tenancies and is entitled to refund of deposits; appeal allowed and Tribunal orders set aside; remittal unnecessary because primary facts were undisputed and the court could draw necessary inferences under s29(2) of Cap 338.