26 Oct 2022
Extension refused because delay was substantial and inordinate, adequately explained by applicant, the decision had been properly served at the last reported address, the applicant failed to identify any arguable error or provide draft grounds and there was no realistic prospect of success, making an extension futile.
29 Nov 2018
Because the same application had previously been refused and the applicant did not appeal within the 14‑day period or seek an extension, the court had no locus to rehear the application and leave was refused.
5 Nov 2012
The husband's summons for leave to appeal out of time was dismissed because s.14(3)(d) of the High Court Ordinance precludes an appeal from a decree absolute where the party had time and opportunity to appeal the decree nisi but did not do so; the Court followed binding authority (LCM v LYY) extending s.14(3)(d) to District Court orders; recusal allegations were unparticularised and insufficient.