28 Mar 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 陳宝生
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 1253
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA157/2024
Appellate court upheld the trial judge's conclusion that the appellant failed to satisfy s26AAB(a)(ii) and (iii): objective and subjective factors (altered/partial receipt, absence of original documentation, and other indicia) gave reason to suspect, and reasonable, proportionate steps available would have revealed the counterfeit; therefore prosecution proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt and conviction is upheld.