1 Oct 1986
THE QUEEN v. CHENG HUNG AND OTHERS
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. CHENG HUNG AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC229/1986
Conviction appeals dismissed because the cautioned statement and palmprint evidence were admissible and sufficient; sentence appeals allowed and reduced from 18 to 12 years for the two appellants because of an unjustifiable disparity with a co-offender and relevant precedent distinguishing firearms carried but not discharged.